PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMC.TO vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSMC.TO is traded in CAD, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMC.TO achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 4.23% return.


XSMC.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.67%
6M
13.55%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

GLD

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.31%
YTD
4.23%
6M
5.02%
1Y
33.74%
3Y*
32.62%
5Y*
21.53%
10Y*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
16.67%0.80%17.06%13.24%-10.56%25.12%8.66%3.84%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
4.23%56.17%37.54%10.21%6.30%-5.02%22.71%-0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMC.TO and GLD is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

-0.08

The correlation between XSMC.TO and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMC.TO
GLD

Financial Services

16.4%

-

Industrials

16.1%

-

Technology

16.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%

-

Healthcare

10.8%

-

Real Estate

7.4%

-

Energy

7.0%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Communication Services

3.2%

-

Utilities

1.8%

-

Financial Services

XSMC.TO
16.4%
GLD

-

Industrials

XSMC.TO
16.1%
GLD

-

Technology

XSMC.TO
16.0%
GLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

XSMC.TO
12.9%
GLD

-

Healthcare

XSMC.TO
10.8%
GLD

-

Real Estate

XSMC.TO
7.4%
GLD

-

Energy

XSMC.TO
7.0%
GLD

-

Basic Materials

XSMC.TO
4.6%
GLD
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

XSMC.TO
3.4%
GLD

-

Communication Services

XSMC.TO
3.2%
GLD

-

Utilities

XSMC.TO
1.8%
GLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMC.TO vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMC.TO
XSMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMC.TOGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

1.34

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

1.75

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

1.96

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.56

4.81

+8.75

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMC.TO and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMC.TOGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.34

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.28

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -33.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMC.TO and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMC.TOGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-33.56%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-17.28%

+8.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.05%

-17.28%

-9.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-17.47%

-9.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-15.45%

+15.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-11.64%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

7.04%

-4.63%

Volatility

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) is 4.12%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that XSMC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMC.TOGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

5.37%

-1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

21.82%

-10.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

25.39%

-7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

16.86%

+2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

15.40%

+7.90%

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMC.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSMC.TO vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

XSMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
0.99%1.16%1.74%1.00%1.09%1.19%0.78%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMC.TO and GLD have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSMC.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSMC.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

XSMC.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while GLD is Gold. XSMC.TO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSMC.TO and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMC.TO and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer