PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSMC.TO vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSMC.TO is traded in CAD, while AVUV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVUV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSMC.TO achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.47% return.


XSMC.TO

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.55%
YTD
16.67%
6M
13.55%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.23%
YTD
19.47%
6M
16.78%
1Y
38.24%
3Y*
20.63%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
16.67%0.80%17.06%13.24%-10.56%25.12%8.66%4.33%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.47%2.51%18.67%20.11%1.87%40.91%4.63%6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XSMC.TO and AVUV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.81

The correlation between XSMC.TO and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSMC.TO
AVUV

Financial Services

16.4%
25.8%

Industrials

16.1%
13.9%

Technology

16.0%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
18.0%

Healthcare

10.8%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.4%
0.7%

Energy

7.0%
18.2%

Basic Materials

4.6%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.8%

Utilities

1.8%
0.1%

Financial Services

XSMC.TO
16.4%
AVUV
25.8%

Industrials

XSMC.TO
16.1%
AVUV
13.9%

Technology

XSMC.TO
16.0%
AVUV
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XSMC.TO
12.9%
AVUV
18.0%

Healthcare

XSMC.TO
10.8%
AVUV
4.2%

Real Estate

XSMC.TO
7.4%
AVUV
0.7%

Energy

XSMC.TO
7.0%
AVUV
18.2%

Basic Materials

XSMC.TO
4.6%
AVUV
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

XSMC.TO
3.4%
AVUV
4.5%

Communication Services

XSMC.TO
3.2%
AVUV
2.8%

Utilities

XSMC.TO
1.8%
AVUV
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSMC.TO
XSMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSMC.TOAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.84

2.22

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.73

3.13

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

4.91

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.56

16.91

-3.35

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSMC.TO and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSMC.TOAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.22

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.68

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Drawdowns

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.30%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -44.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSMC.TO and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSMC.TOAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.30%

-44.29%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-7.82%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.05%

-27.37%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.05%

-27.37%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.57%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-6.88%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.27%

+0.14%

Volatility

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMC.TO) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSMC.TOAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.09%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

11.60%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

17.36%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

20.53%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

25.67%

-2.37%

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSMC.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSMC.TO vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

XSMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than AVUV's 1.29% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.29%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%
XSMC.TO
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF
0.99%1.16%1.74%1.00%1.09%1.19%0.78%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSMC.TO and AVUV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSMC.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSMC.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

XSMC.TO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for XSMC.TO and 0.25% for AVUV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSMC.TO and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer