PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSLR.L is traded in USD, while XXTW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XXTW.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSLR.L achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than XXTW.L's 24.17% return.


XSLR.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
2.73%
6M
28.87%
1Y
113.60%
3Y*
45.92%
5Y*
21.26%
10Y*

XXTW.L

1D
-1.82%
1M
14.17%
YTD
24.17%
6M
23.85%
1Y
51.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XSLR.L
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities
2.73%147.42%21.28%5.17%
XXTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF
24.17%22.41%33.94%14.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XSLR.L and XXTW.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSLR.L
XSLR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XSLR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSLR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

XXTW.L
XXTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSLR.LXXTW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.05

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

9.33

-3.30

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSLR.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XXTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSLR.L and XXTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSLR.LXXTW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.58

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.61

-0.77

Drawdowns

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSLR.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than XXTW.L's maximum drawdown of -26.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.L and XXTW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSLR.LXXTW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.77%

-26.61%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.77%

-16.84%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.49%

-2.61%

-32.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.90%

-4.09%

-10.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.76%

5.51%

+13.25%

Volatility

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) at 6.79%. This indicates that XSLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSLR.LXXTW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

6.79%

+10.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.30%

15.19%

+38.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.91%

19.87%

+36.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.23%

22.00%

+13.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.16%

22.00%

+13.16%

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSLR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XXTW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSLR.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSLR.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSLR.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSLR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSLR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.

XSLR.L is categorized as Silver, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XSLR.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSLR.L and 0.25% for XXTW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSLR.L and XXTW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer