XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L).
XSLR.L and XNAQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSLR.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 29, 2020. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both XSLR.L and XNAQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSLR.L Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities | 5.14% | 147.42% | 21.28% | -0.78% | 3.55% | -13.30% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | -5.26% | 20.14% | 26.48% | 55.63% | -33.41% | 24.52% |
Different Trading Currencies
XSLR.L is traded in USD, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSLR.L achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than XNAQ.L's -5.26% return.
XSLR.L
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -14.06%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 59.12%
- 1Y
- 122.51%
- 3Y*
- 46.03%
- 5Y*
- 24.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -2.27%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSLR.L and XNAQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSLR.L
XNAQ.L
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSLR.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.30 | 1.24 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 1.83 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.24 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.11 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | 7.73 | +1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSLR.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 1.24 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.64 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.62 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSLR.L and XNAQ.L is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XSLR.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSLR.L drawdown since its inception was -40.77%, which is greater than XNAQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSLR.L and XNAQ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSLR.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.77% | -27.52% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.77% | -11.05% | -29.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.77% | -27.52% | -13.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.98% | -8.18% | -25.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -7.19% | -7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.15% | 3.68% | +9.47% |
Volatility
XSLR.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Silver ETC Securities (XSLR.L) has a higher volatility of 18.70% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) at 5.69%. This indicates that XSLR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSLR.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.70% | 5.69% | +13.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.97% | 11.92% | +39.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.01% | 19.87% | +33.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.05% | 20.46% | +13.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 20.55% | +13.93% |