XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L
XSKR.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSKR.L is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while PQVG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSKR.L returned 5.91%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for PQVG.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSKR.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.
Performance
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSKR.L achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.79% return.
XSKR.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- -6.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
PQVG.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 24.01%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.68%
- 10Y*
- —
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSKR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 4.33% | 9.54% | 11.64% | 14.09% | -6.11% | 7.74% | -7.30% | -1.29% | -7.60% | -4.03% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 16.79% | 5.84% | 32.29% | 0.98% | 12.54% | 27.78% | 4.44% | 21.16% | -1.98% | 14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSKR.L and PQVG.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.42 |
The correlation between XSKR.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSKR.L
PQVG.L
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
XSKR.L
PQVG.L
Real Estate
XSKR.L
PQVG.L
-
Basic Materials
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Consumer Defensive
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Energy
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Financial Services
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Healthcare
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Industrials
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Technology
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Utilities
XSKR.L
-
PQVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSKR.L
PQVG.L
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSKR.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.41 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 5.82 | -6.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 17.49 | -18.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSKR.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 2.31 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.12 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.89 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSKR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.21%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSKR.L and PQVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSKR.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.21% | -25.88% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -4.11% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -17.44% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.88% | -17.44% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | 0.00% | -8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -4.17% | -5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.97% | 1.37% | +5.60% |
Volatility
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that XSKR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSKR.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 2.79% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 7.88% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 10.37% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 14.89% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 16.24% | -0.46% |
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSKR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSKR.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison
XSKR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.77% | 0.82% | 0.82% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 0.87% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.30% | 0.72% |
XSKR.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSKR.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSKR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSKR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PQVG.L.
XSKR.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. XSKR.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSKR.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.
Find the right allocation for XSKR.L and PQVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer