PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSKR.L vs. MINV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSKR.L achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly higher than MINV.L's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, XSKR.L has underperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 2.84%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.


XSKR.L

1D
0.08%
1M
2.97%
YTD
4.33%
6M
5.35%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
2.84%

MINV.L

1D
0.15%
1M
1.90%
YTD
1.01%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSKR.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
4.33%9.54%11.64%14.09%-6.11%7.74%-7.30%-1.29%-7.60%4.43%
MINV.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF
1.01%3.37%12.86%1.50%1.23%15.98%-1.05%18.84%3.17%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XSKR.L and MINV.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2012

0.55

The correlation between XSKR.L and MINV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSKR.L
MINV.L

Communication Services

90.0%
11.9%

Real Estate

10.1%
0.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.8%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

14.2%

Healthcare

-

13.6%

Industrials

-

9.1%

Technology

-

21.3%

Utilities

-

7.7%

Communication Services

XSKR.L
90.0%
MINV.L
11.9%

Real Estate

XSKR.L
10.1%
MINV.L
0.7%

Basic Materials

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
10.8%

Energy

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
4.2%

Financial Services

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
14.2%

Healthcare

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
13.6%

Industrials

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
9.1%

Technology

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
21.3%

Utilities

XSKR.L

-

MINV.L
7.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSKR.L
XSKR.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSKR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MINV.L
MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSKR.LMINV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.06

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

0.41

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

1.10

-1.98

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSKR.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSKR.L and MINV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSKR.LMINV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

0.32

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.65

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.66

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.83

-0.50

Drawdowns

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSKR.L drawdown since its inception was -36.21%, which is greater than MINV.L's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSKR.L and MINV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSKR.LMINV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.21%

-20.38%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-6.31%

-8.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-8.47%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.88%

-10.23%

-7.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.21%

-20.38%

-15.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

-3.60%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-3.74%

-5.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.97%

2.33%

+4.64%

Volatility

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Communication Services ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XSKR.L) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that XSKR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSKR.LMINV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

2.55%

+2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

5.92%

+6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

7.92%

+6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

9.70%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

11.85%

+3.93%

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSKR.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSKR.L vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XSKR.L nor MINV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XSKR.L and MINV.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSKR.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSKR.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MINV.L.

XSKR.L is categorized as Communications Equities, while MINV.L is Global Equities. XSKR.L tracks MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, while MINV.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XSKR.L and 0.35% for MINV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSKR.L and MINV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer