XSHQ vs. PBW
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW).
XSHQ and PBW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index. It was launched on Apr 6, 2017. PBW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both XSHQ and PBW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XSHQ vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XSHQ vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 0.55% | 0.89% | 7.49% | 23.88% | -15.01% | 23.99% | 11.81% | 17.37% | -6.11% | 7.18% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 3.51% | 53.96% | -30.77% | -20.03% | -44.55% | -29.86% | 204.82% | 62.58% | -14.11% | 18.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than PBW's 3.51% return.
XSHQ
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 0.55%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- 1Y
- 8.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PBW
- 1D
- 4.99%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 102.59%
- 3Y*
- -6.15%
- 5Y*
- -18.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSHQ vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XSHQ vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
XSHQ
PBW
XSHQ vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSHQ | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.39 | 2.41 | -2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 2.91 | -2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 4.66 | -3.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | 12.87 | -10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSHQ | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 | 2.41 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | -0.44 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | -0.07 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHQ and PBW is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XSHQ vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than PBW's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 2.02% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 0.86% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
XSHQ vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and PBW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHQ | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.33% | -89.02% | +50.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -21.24% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -84.98% | +57.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | -73.91% | +64.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -62.86% | +53.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 7.70% | -3.38% |
Volatility
XSHQ vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) is 5.87%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that XSHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XSHQ | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 12.60% | -6.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.68% | 31.89% | -19.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 42.85% | -21.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 42.94% | -21.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.26% | 38.49% | -15.23% |