XSHQ vs. AVUV
XSHQ (Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSHQ is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. XSHQ is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHQ returned 5.96%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XSHQ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 17.96% return.
XSHQ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- 11.81%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 9.09% | 0.89% | 7.49% | 23.88% | -15.01% | 23.99% | 11.81% | 6.70% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 17.96% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHQ and AVUV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XSHQ and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHQ
AVUV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XSHQ
AVUV
Industrials
XSHQ
AVUV
Technology
XSHQ
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
XSHQ
AVUV
Healthcare
XSHQ
AVUV
Energy
XSHQ
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
XSHQ
AVUV
Basic Materials
XSHQ
AVUV
Communication Services
XSHQ
AVUV
Real Estate
XSHQ
AVUV
Utilities
XSHQ
-
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHQ vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
XSHQ
AVUV
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSHQ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 4.61 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 13.69 | -9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSHQ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.10 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.47 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.56 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHQ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.33% | -49.42% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.27% | -7.95% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.34% | -28.79% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.34% | -28.79% | +1.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -1.12% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -7.95% | -1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 2.67% | +1.08% |
Volatility
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.08%. This indicates that XSHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHQ | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.08% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 11.34% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 17.54% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 22.74% | -1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 28.30% | -5.17% |
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSHQ vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than AVUV's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.29% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSHQ Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.15% | 2.02% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.11% | 1.16% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHQ and AVUV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSHQ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to AVUV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHQ dropped -38.33% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.71% vs 5.96% for XSHQ. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.71% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XSHQ.
XSHQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 1.29% for AVUV.
XSHQ is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSHQ and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSHQ and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer