PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHQ vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 23.62% return.


XSHQ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.52%
6M
11.29%
YTD
14.76%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.92%

AVUV

1D
0.03%
1M
1.43%
6M
15.37%
YTD
23.62%
1Y
40.65%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$143.14M$148.43M$155.85M
$7.28M$3.86M$2.26M

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
14.76%0.89%7.49%23.88%-15.01%23.99%11.81%5.64%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
23.62%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHQ and AVUV is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.91

The correlation between XSHQ and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSHQ
AVUV

Financial Services

24.7%
27.8%

Technology

22.6%
7.4%

Industrials

20.5%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
18.5%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.3%

Energy

4.1%
13.9%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

2.6%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.7%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Financial Services

XSHQ
24.7%
AVUV
27.8%

Technology

XSHQ
22.6%
AVUV
7.4%

Industrials

XSHQ
20.5%
AVUV
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XSHQ
14.4%
AVUV
18.5%

Healthcare

XSHQ
5.8%
AVUV
5.3%

Energy

XSHQ
4.1%
AVUV
13.9%

Communication Services

XSHQ
2.9%
AVUV
2.9%

Basic Materials

XSHQ
2.6%
AVUV
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSHQ
2.4%
AVUV
4.9%

Real Estate

XSHQ
1.0%
AVUV
0.7%

Utilities

XSHQ

-

AVUV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHQ vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XSHQ
XSHQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XSHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSHQAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.40

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

4.74

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.91

14.98

-10.07

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHQ and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHQAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.33%

-49.42%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-7.95%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-28.79%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-28.79%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.72%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-7.78%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

2.52%

+1.21%

Volatility

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 2.88%. This indicates that XSHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHQAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

2.88%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

10.51%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

16.90%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.06%

22.40%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.00%

28.02%

-5.02%

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSHQ vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than AVUV's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.25%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
1.18%1.48%1.18%1.15%2.02%1.25%1.24%1.11%1.16%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHQ and AVUV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSHQ has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to AVUV (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHQ dropped -38.33% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 13.16% vs 7.26% for XSHQ. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 13.16% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for XSHQ.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.18% for XSHQ.

XSHQ is categorized as Quality Factor, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSHQ and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHQ and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer