PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHQ vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHQ achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.04% return.


XSHQ

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.37%
YTD
9.09%
6M
8.27%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*

AVDV

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.98%
YTD
16.04%
6M
19.54%
1Y
44.23%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
9.09%0.89%7.49%23.88%-15.01%23.99%11.81%6.70%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
16.04%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHQ and AVDV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.68

The correlation between XSHQ and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSHQ
AVDV

Financial Services

24.0%
13.7%

Industrials

21.1%
21.3%

Technology

17.6%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

16.3%
14.4%

Healthcare

8.0%
2.1%

Energy

4.5%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.5%
22.5%

Communication Services

1.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.1%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Financial Services

XSHQ
24.0%
AVDV
13.7%

Industrials

XSHQ
21.1%
AVDV
21.3%

Technology

XSHQ
17.6%
AVDV
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XSHQ
16.3%
AVDV
14.4%

Healthcare

XSHQ
8.0%
AVDV
2.1%

Energy

XSHQ
4.5%
AVDV
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSHQ
4.0%
AVDV
3.4%

Basic Materials

XSHQ
2.5%
AVDV
22.5%

Communication Services

XSHQ
1.0%
AVDV
2.0%

Real Estate

XSHQ
0.9%
AVDV
1.1%

Utilities

XSHQ

-

AVDV
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHQ vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHQ
XSHQ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XSHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSHQAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.52

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.37

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

13.67

-9.62

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHQ and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSHQAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.86

-1.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.80

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.80

-0.43

Drawdowns

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHQ drawdown since its inception was -38.33%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHQ and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHQAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.33%

-43.01%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-13.19%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-14.17%

-13.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.34%

-28.08%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

-1.35%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-6.77%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

3.24%

+0.51%

Volatility

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) is 4.57%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that XSHQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHQAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

4.92%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

13.07%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

15.56%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

17.30%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.13%

19.73%

+3.40%

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHQ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSHQ vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

XSHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.74%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
1.38%1.48%1.18%1.15%2.02%1.25%1.24%1.11%1.16%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHQ and AVDV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to XSHQ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHQ dropped -38.33% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 5.96% for XSHQ. On fees, XSHQ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XSHQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 5.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSHQ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.38% for XSHQ.

XSHQ is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XSHQ and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHQ and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer