PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XSHG.TO (iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF) and ZST.TO (BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds. XSHG.TO is passively managed, while ZST.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XSHG.TO returned 5.72%/yr vs 3.84%/yr for ZST.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.17% expense ratio.

Performance

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSHG.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHG.TO achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than ZST.TO's 1.08% return.

XSHG.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.96%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZST.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.08%
6M
0.26%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XSHG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		1.14%4.53%6.86%6.41%-4.26%-0.58%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF		1.08%2.03%5.16%5.33%1.19%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHG.TO and ZST.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF

BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF

Often compared with XSHG.TO:
XSHG.TO vs. XSAB.TOXSHG.TO vs. XCBG.TOXSHG.TO vs. XSTB.TOXSHG.TO vs. VFV.TOXSHG.TO vs. BSVXSHG.TO vs. ZBI.TOXSHG.TO vs. CLF.TO
Often compared with ZST.TO:
ZST.TO vs. ZAG.TOZST.TO vs. CASH.TOZST.TO vs. CBIL.TOZST.TO vs. VXC.TOZST.TO vs. DXV.TOZST.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZST.TO vs. VDY.TO

Return for Risk

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSHG.TO
XSHG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XSHG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
ZST.TO
ZST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSHG.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSHG.TOZST.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.95
1.56

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.84
1.64

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.83

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.68

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

4.51

+5.03

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHG.TO and ZST.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSHG.TOZST.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.56

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

4.12

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

3.30

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

1.81

-0.79

Drawdowns

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHG.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, which is greater than ZST.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHG.TO and ZST.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XSHG.TOZST.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-1.06%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.01%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

-1.01%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-1.01%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-1.06%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-0.13%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.37%

0.00%

Volatility

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSHG.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.68% compared to BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that XSHG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XSHG.TOZST.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.08%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.52%

1.05%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82%

1.08%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

0.72%

+2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

0.71%

+2.08%

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XSHG.TO and ZST.TO have an expense ratio of 0.17%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XSHG.TO vs. ZST.TO - Dividend Comparison

XSHG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than ZST.TO's 2.55% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XSHG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced 1-5 Year Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		3.72%3.64%3.39%2.87%2.69%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF		2.55%2.82%4.65%4.79%2.75%2.29%2.65%2.82%3.43%4.05%3.92%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

XSHG.TO and ZST.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.17% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSHG.TO and ZST.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.17% per year.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHG.TO and ZST.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer