XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L
XSHC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XSHC.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHC.L returned 6.64%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHC.L achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XSHC.L
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | -2.30% | 6.84% | 4.08% | -3.58% | 8.14% | 28.13% | 9.97% | 16.71% | 14.71% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHC.L and XSTC.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.45 |
The correlation between XSHC.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHC.L
XSTC.L
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XSHC.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Communication Services
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
Industrials
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
Real Estate
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Technology
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
Utilities
XSHC.L
-
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSHC.L
XSTC.L
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSHC.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 3.04 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 7.79 | -4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSHC.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.70 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.09 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.14 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHC.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHC.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -29.30% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -17.49% | +5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -29.30% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -29.30% | +10.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -2.71% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -6.30% | +1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 6.83% | -1.92% |
Volatility
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) is 5.43%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XSHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHC.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 7.05% | -1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 14.45% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 19.63% | -4.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 22.22% | -8.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 22.43% | -6.69% |
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XSHC.L and XSTC.L have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSHC.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than XSTC.L's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.55% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 0.98% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHC.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSHC.L and XSTC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
XSHC.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XSHC.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD.
Find the right allocation for XSHC.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer