PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XSHC.L is traded in GBp, while HEAE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HEAE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHC.L achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly higher than HEAE.L's -2.42% return.


XSHC.L

1D
2.98%
1M
5.65%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*

HEAE.L

1D
3.29%
1M
1.82%
YTD
-2.42%
6M
-1.32%
1Y
9.06%
3Y*
2.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
-2.30%6.84%4.08%-3.58%3.85%
HEAE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF
-2.42%13.38%-1.21%5.53%-5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHC.L and HEAE.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.49

The correlation between XSHC.L and HEAE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHC.L
XSHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

HEAE.L
HEAE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HEAE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSHC.LHEAE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.11

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.66

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

1.57

+1.62

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the HEAE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHC.L and HEAE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSHC.LHEAE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.54

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.14

+0.48

Drawdowns

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum HEAE.L drawdown of -24.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHC.L and HEAE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHC.LHEAE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-24.51%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

-13.73%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.16%

-24.51%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-10.88%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-7.69%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

5.78%

-0.87%

Volatility

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HEAE.L) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHC.LHEAE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

5.60%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

12.12%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

16.79%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

16.28%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.74%

16.28%

-0.54%

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSHC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than HEAE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XSHC.L vs. HEAE.L - Dividend Comparison

XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while HEAE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HEAE.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
1.28%1.25%1.25%1.23%1.55%0.85%1.12%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHC.L and HEAE.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSHC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSHC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HEAE.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSHC.L and 0.18% for HEAE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHC.L and HEAE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer