XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L
XSHC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) and BTEK.L (iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XSHC.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while BTEK.L tracks the NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSHC.L returned 6.64%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for BTEK.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSHC.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BTEK.L.
Performance
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSHC.L is traded in GBp, while BTEK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the BTEK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSHC.L achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than BTEK.L's 4.86% return.
XSHC.L
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- -1.90%
- 1Y
- 15.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BTEK.L
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 43.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- —
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | -2.30% | 6.84% | 4.08% | -3.58% | 8.14% | 28.13% | 9.97% | 16.71% | 14.71% |
BTEK.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 4.86% | 23.81% | -0.32% | 0.33% | -1.55% | 0.90% | 23.11% | 21.63% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSHC.L and BTEK.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XSHC.L and BTEK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSHC.L
BTEK.L
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
XSHC.L
BTEK.L
Basic Materials
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Communication Services
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Energy
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Financial Services
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Industrials
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Real Estate
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Technology
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Utilities
XSHC.L
-
BTEK.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L — Risk / Return Rank
XSHC.L
BTEK.L
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) and iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSHC.L | BTEK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 6.23 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | 17.55 | -14.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSHC.L | BTEK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.24 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.29 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.31 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSHC.L drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, smaller than the maximum BTEK.L drawdown of -30.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHC.L and BTEK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSHC.L | BTEK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.16% | -30.86% | +11.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -6.89% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.16% | -26.34% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.16% | -30.86% | +11.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.62% | -1.86% | -3.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -10.04% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 2.45% | +2.46% |
Volatility
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) is 5.43%, while iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF (BTEK.L) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that XSHC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTEK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSHC.L | BTEK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.43% | 6.91% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 14.67% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 19.14% | -4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 20.08% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 21.71% | -5.97% |
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSHC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEK.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSHC.L vs. BTEK.L - Dividend Comparison
XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while BTEK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTEK.L iShares Nasdaq US Biotechnology UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSHC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D | 1.28% | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.55% | 0.85% | 1.12% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSHC.L and BTEK.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSHC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSHC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BTEK.L.
XSHC.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while BTEK.L tracks NASDAQ Biotechnology TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XSHC.L and 0.35% for BTEK.L.
Find the right allocation for XSHC.L and BTEK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer