PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS7R.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 31.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L has underperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 10.57%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


XS7R.L

1D
0.42%
1M
3.51%
YTD
2.58%
6M
9.20%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
17.60%
10Y*
10.57%

XDJP.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
10.95%
YTD
31.98%
6M
29.24%
1Y
64.30%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS7R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
2.58%47.44%18.33%20.38%3.19%27.29%-19.81%7.94%-24.58%16.49%
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
31.98%21.04%9.67%15.52%-10.26%-3.79%21.77%16.58%-3.53%14.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XS7R.L and XDJP.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2013

0.38

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS7R.L
XDJP.L

Financial Services

97.1%
3.1%

Technology

1.8%
31.9%

Industrials

1.1%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%
16.9%

Basic Materials

-

4.3%

Communication Services

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

6.7%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Utilities

-

0.2%

Financial Services

XS7R.L
97.1%
XDJP.L
3.1%

Technology

XS7R.L
1.8%
XDJP.L
31.9%

Industrials

XS7R.L
1.1%
XDJP.L
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XS7R.L
0.3%
XDJP.L
16.9%

Basic Materials

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
4.3%

Communication Services

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
3.3%

Energy

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
0.3%

Healthcare

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
6.7%

Real Estate

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
1.5%

Utilities

XS7R.L

-

XDJP.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS7R.L
XS7R.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS7R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XDJP.L
XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS7R.LXDJP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.77

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

14.50

-7.91

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS7R.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS7R.LXDJP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.85

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.71

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.75

-0.65

Drawdowns

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS7R.L drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than XDJP.L's maximum drawdown of -23.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS7R.L and XDJP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS7R.LXDJP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.04%

-23.69%

-42.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-13.40%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-18.82%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.60%

-20.61%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.42%

-23.69%

-31.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-1.35%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.41%

-6.79%

-19.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

4.42%

-1.10%

Volatility

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) is 5.07%, while Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that XS7R.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS7R.LXDJP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

6.75%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

17.68%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.25%

22.44%

-6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.86%

17.72%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.52%

17.63%

+4.89%

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS7R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XS7R.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

XS7R.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.L
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
1.04%1.33%1.41%1.59%2.47%1.20%1.11%1.13%1.24%0.72%0.83%0.16%
XS7R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XS7R.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS7R.L.

XS7R.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. XS7R.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS7R.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS7R.L and XDJP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer