XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XS7R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and X7PP.L (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L returned 10.57%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for X7PP.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS7R.L achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than X7PP.L's 5.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XS7R.L has underperformed X7PP.L with an annualized return of 10.57%, while X7PP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.

XS7R.L

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 2.58%
• 6M: 9.20%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 26.51%
• 5Y*: 17.60%
• 10Y*: 10.57%

X7PP.L

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 6.36%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 6M: 11.61%
• 1Y: 43.21%
• 3Y*: 42.86%
• 5Y*: 27.44%
• 10Y*: 14.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XS7R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	2.58%	47.44%	18.33%	20.38%	3.19%	27.29%	-19.81%	7.94%	-24.58%	16.49%
X7PP.L Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF	5.21%	87.77%	27.07%	23.27%	6.04%	29.16%	-18.50%	8.33%	-25.45%	15.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XS7R.L and X7PP.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014	0.93

The correlation between XS7R.L and X7PP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XS7R.L	X7PP.L
Financial Services	97.1%	100.0%
Technology	1.8%	-
Industrials	1.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS7R.L

XS7R.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XS7R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
XS7R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XS7R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XS7R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

X7PP.L

X7PP.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
X7PP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
X7PP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
X7PP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
X7PP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XS7R.L	X7PP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.98	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.68	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	2.70	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.59	9.03	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS7R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the X7PP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS7R.L and X7PP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XS7R.L	X7PP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.98	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	1.17	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.61	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.42	-0.32

Drawdowns

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS7R.L drawdown since its inception was -66.04%, which is greater than X7PP.L's maximum drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS7R.L and X7PP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XS7R.L	X7PP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.04%	-56.28%	-9.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-15.94%	+4.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.17%	-18.17%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.60%	-30.79%	+7.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.42%	-56.28%	+0.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.39%	-1.64%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.41%	-15.39%	-11.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	4.77%	-1.45%

Volatility

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Financials ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS7R.L) is 5.07%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (X7PP.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that XS7R.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XS7R.L	X7PP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	6.19%	-1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	17.80%	-4.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.25%	21.78%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.86%	23.48%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.52%	24.63%	-2.11%

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XS7R.L and X7PP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XS7R.L vs. X7PP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS7R.L nor X7PP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XS7R.L and X7PP.L in my portfolio?

XS7R.L and X7PP.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XS7R.L or X7PP.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XS7R.L or X7PP.L?

XS7R.L and X7PP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between XS7R.L and X7PP.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Financials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco.