PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XS6R.L is traded in GBp, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS6R.L achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 12.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XS6R.L having a 11.52% annualized return and UTIL.L not far ahead at 11.76%.


XS6R.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
10.83%
6M
12.11%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.52%

UTIL.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
12.15%
6M
12.96%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
11.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS6R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
10.83%38.34%-1.20%11.55%-3.84%1.17%18.06%22.81%3.39%14.10%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
12.15%41.15%-3.27%10.84%-1.95%1.85%18.14%21.99%4.37%13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XS6R.L and UTIL.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.95

The correlation between XS6R.L and UTIL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS6R.L
UTIL.L

Utilities

94.7%
95.4%

Industrials

5.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XS6R.L
94.7%
UTIL.L
95.4%

Industrials

XS6R.L
5.3%
UTIL.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Energy

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Financial Services

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Real Estate

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Technology

XS6R.L

-

UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS6R.L
XS6R.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS6R.LUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.35

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.50

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

10.34

-1.17

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS6R.L and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS6R.LUTIL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.99

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.66

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.55

-0.17

Drawdowns

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS6R.L drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, roughly equal to the maximum UTIL.L drawdown of -28.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS6R.L and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS6R.LUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.46%

-28.73%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-8.58%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-12.60%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-19.90%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.10%

-28.73%

+1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-5.73%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-5.71%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.91%

+0.10%

Volatility

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS6R.LUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.55%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

12.97%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

15.09%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

16.35%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.82%

-0.85%

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS6R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XS6R.L vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS6R.L nor UTIL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XS6R.L and UTIL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UTIL.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UTIL.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XS6R.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS6R.L and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS6R.L and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer