XS6R.L vs. RENG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XS6R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and RENG.L (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XS6R.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while RENG.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XS6R.L returned 11.38%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for RENG.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XS6R.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for RENG.L.

Performance

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS6R.L achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than RENG.L's 42.56% return.

XS6R.L

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: 10.83%
• 6M: 12.11%
• 1Y: 27.70%
• 3Y*: 16.17%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: 11.52%

RENG.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 42.56%
• 6M: 39.73%
• 1Y: 85.21%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 9.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XS6R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	10.83%	38.34%	-1.20%	11.55%	-3.84%	1.17%	2.80%
RENG.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF	42.56%	40.21%	-12.86%	-13.13%	2.03%	-6.20%	19.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XS6R.L and RENG.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2020	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between XS6R.L and RENG.L has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XS6R.L	RENG.L
Utilities	94.7%	22.3%
Industrials	5.3%	49.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	1.6%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	23.8%

Return for Risk

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS6R.L

XS6R.L Risk / Return Rank: 54
XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XS6R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
XS6R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XS6R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XS6R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 54

RENG.L

RENG.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
RENG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RENG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
RENG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
RENG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RENG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XS6R.L	RENG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	3.81	-1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	4.50	-2.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.60	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	9.59	-6.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.18	33.84	-24.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the RENG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS6R.L and RENG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XS6R.L	RENG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	3.81	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.43	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.47	-0.08

Drawdowns

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS6R.L drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum RENG.L drawdown of -45.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS6R.L and RENG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XS6R.L	RENG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.46%	-45.48%	+16.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-8.84%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.84%	-33.95%	+21.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.38%	-40.27%	+18.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.21%	-3.08%	-3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.53%	-20.64%	+13.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.51%	+0.50%

Volatility

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) is 5.31%, while L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENG.L) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that XS6R.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RENG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XS6R.L	RENG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	8.25%	-2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.87%	15.75%	-2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.96%	22.23%	-7.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	21.71%	-5.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	22.30%	-5.33%

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS6R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RENG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

XS6R.L vs. RENG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS6R.L nor RENG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XS6R.L and RENG.L in my portfolio?

XS6R.L and RENG.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XS6R.L or RENG.L?

On fees, XS6R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XS6R.L or RENG.L?

XS6R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RENG.L.

What is the main difference between XS6R.L and RENG.L?

XS6R.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while RENG.L is Energy Equities. XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while RENG.L tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS6R.L and 0.49% for RENG.L.