XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS
XS6R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and IWDA.AS (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - XS6R.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while IWDA.AS is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XS6R.L returned 11.52%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for IWDA.AS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XS6R.L is traded in GBp, while IWDA.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IWDA.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XS6R.L achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.AS's 10.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XS6R.L has underperformed IWDA.AS with an annualized return of 11.52%, while IWDA.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.
XS6R.L
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.52%
IWDA.AS
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 27.14%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- 13.91%
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS6R.L Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 10.83% | 38.34% | -1.20% | 11.55% | -3.84% | 1.17% | 18.06% | 22.81% | 3.39% | 14.10% |
IWDA.AS iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.25% | 12.81% | 21.44% | 17.50% | -9.07% | 24.68% | 12.21% | 22.23% | -3.21% | 12.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XS6R.L and IWDA.AS is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2009 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XS6R.L and IWDA.AS has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS — Risk / Return Rank
XS6R.L
IWDA.AS
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XS6R.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.48 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 4.15 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 16.17 | -7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XS6R.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.57 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.94 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.92 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.81 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XS6R.L drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, which is greater than IWDA.AS's maximum drawdown of -26.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS6R.L and IWDA.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XS6R.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.46% | -26.21% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -6.46% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.84% | -19.60% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -19.60% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.10% | -26.21% | -0.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.21% | -0.14% | -6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -3.57% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 1.67% | +1.34% |
Volatility
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) at 2.82%. This indicates that XS6R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XS6R.L | IWDA.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 2.82% | +2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.87% | 7.45% | +5.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 10.40% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 13.65% | +2.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 14.83% | +2.14% |
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XS6R.L and IWDA.AS have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XS6R.L vs. IWDA.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither XS6R.L nor IWDA.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XS6R.L and IWDA.AS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XS6R.L and IWDA.AS have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
XS6R.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IWDA.AS is Global Equities. XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while IWDA.AS tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XS6R.L and IWDA.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer