PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XS6R.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XS6R.L (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Utilities Equities funds - XS6R.L tracks the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD while INFR.L tracks the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XS6R.L returned 11.52%/yr vs 8.66%/yr for INFR.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XS6R.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS6R.L achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XS6R.L has outperformed INFR.L with an annualized return of 11.52%, while INFR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.

XS6R.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
10.83%
6M
12.11%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.52%

INFR.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.29%
3Y*
9.33%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS6R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C		10.83%38.34%-1.20%11.55%-3.84%1.17%18.06%22.81%3.39%14.10%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		9.52%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%-4.70%20.82%4.39%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XS6R.L and INFR.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2008

0.53

The correlation between XS6R.L and INFR.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XS6R.L
INFR.L

Utilities

94.7%
56.0%

Industrials

5.3%
20.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

16.4%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

5.0%

Technology

-

0.7%

Utilities

XS6R.L
94.7%
INFR.L
56.0%

Industrials

XS6R.L
5.3%
INFR.L
20.8%

Basic Materials

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L

-

Communication Services

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L

-

Energy

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L
16.4%

Financial Services

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L
0.0%

Healthcare

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L

-

Real Estate

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L
5.0%

Technology

XS6R.L

-

INFR.L
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with XS6R.L:
XS6R.L vs. EUN0.DEXS6R.L vs. WDEF.LXS6R.L vs. IRE.MIXS6R.L vs. EXH5.DEXS6R.L vs. GLDXS6R.L vs. ISX5.LXS6R.L vs. IBE.MC
Often compared with INFR.L:
INFR.L vs. DPGT.LINFR.L vs. IWDA.LINFR.L vs. IUIT.LINFR.L vs. ARCK.LINFR.L vs. FWRG.LINFR.L vs. IDWR.LINFR.L vs. WUTI.L

Return for Risk

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XS6R.L
XS6R.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS6R.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XS6R.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.84
1.55

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.38
2.19

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.13

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

7.96

+1.22

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS6R.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS6R.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XS6R.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

1.55

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.62

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.61

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.52

-0.13

Drawdowns

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS6R.L drawdown since its inception was -29.46%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS6R.L and INFR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XS6R.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.46%

-34.25%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-5.19%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-11.08%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-22.87%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.10%

-26.75%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-3.70%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-6.12%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

2.04%

+0.97%

Volatility

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XS6R.L) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 3.92%. This indicates that XS6R.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XS6R.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

3.92%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

8.92%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

10.49%

+4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.20%

12.26%

+3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

14.10%

+2.87%

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS6R.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

XS6R.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

XS6R.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.82%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
XS6R.L
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Utilities ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XS6R.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS6R.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS6R.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

XS6R.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XS6R.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS6R.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer