PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
-9.33%26.58%45.65%48.87%6.40%
XNAS.L
Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF
-5.13%19.83%26.60%56.41%-1.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS2D.L achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly lower than XNAS.L's -5.13% return.


XS2D.L

1D
4.88%
1M
-7.66%
YTD
-9.33%
6M
-4.81%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
30.43%
5Y*
16.54%
10Y*
21.58%

XNAS.L

1D
3.29%
1M
-3.00%
YTD
-5.13%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS2D.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.L
XNAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XS2D.LXNAS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.24

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.84

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

2.71

-1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

10.04

-3.51

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the XNAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS2D.L and XNAS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XS2D.LXNAS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.24

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.33

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between XS2D.L and XNAS.L is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS2D.L nor XNAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS2D.L drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, which is greater than XNAS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS2D.L and XNAS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XS2D.LXNAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.31%

-22.92%

-36.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.93%

-12.62%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.50%

-7.52%

-3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.09%

-3.12%

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.95%

+1.34%

Volatility

XS2D.L vs. XNAS.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Xtrackers NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (XNAS.L) at 5.98%. This indicates that XS2D.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XS2D.LXNAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

5.98%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

11.91%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.77%

19.82%

+11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.69%

19.42%

+12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.32%

19.42%

+12.90%