XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L).
XS2D.L and XNAQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XS2D.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 2010. XNAQ.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. It was launched on Jan 21, 2021. Both XS2D.L and XNAQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -9.33% | 26.58% | 45.65% | 48.87% | -39.09% | 56.37% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | -5.26% | 20.14% | 26.48% | 55.63% | -33.41% | 24.52% |
Different Trading Currencies
XS2D.L is traded in USD, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XS2D.L achieves a -9.33% return, which is significantly lower than XNAQ.L's -5.26% return.
XS2D.L
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -9.33%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 30.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 21.58%
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -5.26%
- 6M
- -2.27%
- 1Y
- 24.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XS2D.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XS2D.L
XNAQ.L
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XS2D.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.92 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 1.83 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.11 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 7.73 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XS2D.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.64 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.62 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between XS2D.L and XNAQ.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XS2D.L nor XNAQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XS2D.L drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, which is greater than XNAQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS2D.L and XNAQ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XS2D.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.31% | -27.52% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -11.05% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.01% | -27.52% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.50% | -8.18% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -7.19% | -1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 3.68% | +0.61% |
Volatility
XS2D.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) at 5.69%. This indicates that XS2D.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XS2D.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 5.69% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.40% | 11.92% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 19.87% | +11.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 20.46% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.32% | 20.55% | +11.77% |