XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L
XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XS2D.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index, while PQVG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XS2D.L returned 18.77%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for PQVG.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XS2D.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.
Performance
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XS2D.L is traded in USD, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XS2D.L achieves a 17.62% return, which is significantly higher than PQVG.L's 14.98% return.
XS2D.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 17.62%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 23.61%
PQVG.L
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- 6M
- 13.28%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 1Y
- 21.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- —
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 17.62% | 26.58% | 45.65% | 48.87% | -39.09% | 63.03% | 20.96% | 62.86% | -15.93% | 29.02% |
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 14.98% | 13.83% | 30.09% | 6.31% | 0.51% | 26.62% | 7.64% | 26.02% | -7.53% | -6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XS2D.L and PQVG.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XS2D.L and PQVG.L has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Technology
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Consumer Cyclical
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Communication Services
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Financial Services
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Industrials
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Healthcare
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Utilities
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Real Estate
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Basic Materials
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Consumer Defensive
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
Energy
XS2D.L
-
PQVG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XS2D.L
PQVG.L
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XS2D.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.31 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.68 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | 13.34 | -4.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XS2D.L drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS2D.L and PQVG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XS2D.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.31% | -33.94% | -25.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.91% | -5.88% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.83% | -15.73% | -19.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.01% | -17.27% | -28.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -5.29% | +3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.93% | -5.15% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 1.63% | +2.67% |
Volatility
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) is 5.61%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that XS2D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XS2D.L | PQVG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 7.36% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.52% | 10.97% | +7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 12.73% | +11.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.89% | 16.15% | +15.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.34% | 18.61% | +13.73% |
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XS2D.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison
XS2D.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.82% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 0.88% | 1.59% | 1.41% | 1.30% | 0.72% |
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XS2D.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PQVG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PQVG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.
XS2D.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XS2D.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.
Find the right allocation for XS2D.L and PQVG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer