PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XS2D.L is traded in USD, while PQVG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PQVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS2D.L achieves a 17.62% return, which is significantly higher than PQVG.L's 14.98% return.


XS2D.L

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.38%
6M
17.03%
YTD
17.62%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
33.50%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
23.61%

PQVG.L

1D
-2.07%
1M
-3.84%
6M
13.28%
YTD
14.98%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
14.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.62%26.58%45.65%48.87%-39.09%63.03%20.96%62.86%-15.93%29.02%
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
14.98%13.83%30.09%6.31%0.51%26.62%7.64%26.02%-7.53%-6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XS2D.L and PQVG.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between XS2D.L and PQVG.L has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XS2D.L
PQVG.L

Technology

56.8%
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
5.1%

Communication Services

6.6%
5.3%

Financial Services

6.0%
13.0%

Industrials

5.9%
21.2%

Healthcare

5.7%
5.2%

Utilities

4.9%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.2%

Basic Materials

2.2%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
2.2%

Energy

-

12.1%

Technology

XS2D.L
56.8%
PQVG.L
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XS2D.L
9.3%
PQVG.L
5.1%

Communication Services

XS2D.L
6.6%
PQVG.L
5.3%

Financial Services

XS2D.L
6.0%
PQVG.L
13.0%

Industrials

XS2D.L
5.9%
PQVG.L
21.2%

Healthcare

XS2D.L
5.7%
PQVG.L
5.2%

Utilities

XS2D.L
4.9%
PQVG.L
0.3%

Real Estate

XS2D.L
2.4%
PQVG.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

XS2D.L
2.2%
PQVG.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

XS2D.L
0.0%
PQVG.L
2.2%

Energy

XS2D.L

-

PQVG.L
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PQVG.L
PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XS2D.LPQVG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.68

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

13.34

-4.24

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS2D.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS2D.L drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS2D.L and PQVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS2D.LPQVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.31%

-33.94%

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.91%

-5.88%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.83%

-15.73%

-19.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

-17.27%

-28.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-5.29%

+3.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-5.15%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

1.63%

+2.67%

Volatility

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) is 5.61%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that XS2D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS2D.LPQVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

7.36%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

10.97%

+7.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.27%

12.73%

+11.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

16.15%

+15.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

18.61%

+13.73%

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS2D.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XS2D.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

XS2D.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PQVG.L
Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF
0.83%0.83%0.82%1.61%1.77%0.88%1.59%1.41%1.30%0.72%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XS2D.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PQVG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PQVG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

XS2D.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XS2D.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS2D.L and PQVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer