PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XS2D.L is traded in USD, while 3APE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 3APE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XS2D.L achieves a 17.62% return, which is significantly lower than 3APE.L's 28.09% return.


XS2D.L

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.38%
6M
17.03%
YTD
17.62%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
33.50%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
23.61%

3APE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
14.88%
6M
50.99%
YTD
28.09%
1Y
138.54%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.62%26.58%45.65%48.87%-39.09%63.03%41.85%
3APE.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR
28.09%-22.68%67.09%165.81%-75.72%87.26%243.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XS2D.L and 3APE.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.63

The correlation between XS2D.L and 3APE.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

3APE.L
3APE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
3APE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3APE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
3APE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3APE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
3APE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XS2D.L3APE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.31

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

7.39

+1.71

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the 3APE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XS2D.L and 3APE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XS2D.L drawdown since its inception was -59.31%, smaller than the maximum 3APE.L drawdown of -78.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XS2D.L and 3APE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XS2D.L3APE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.31%

-78.44%

+19.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.91%

-41.80%

+24.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.83%

-72.59%

+37.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.01%

-78.44%

+32.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-4.59%

+2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-35.50%

+26.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

18.75%

-14.45%

Volatility

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) is 5.61%, while Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETC EUR (3APE.L) has a volatility of 29.62%. This indicates that XS2D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3APE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XS2D.L3APE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

29.62%

-24.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.52%

60.10%

-41.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.27%

78.40%

-54.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.89%

81.31%

-49.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.34%

83.96%

-51.62%

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XS2D.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than 3APE.L's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XS2D.L vs. 3APE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XS2D.L nor 3APE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XS2D.L and 3APE.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XS2D.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XS2D.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3APE.L.

XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index, while 3APE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XS2D.L and 0.75% for 3APE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XS2D.L and 3APE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer