XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XRSM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and XNGI.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XRSM.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while XNGI.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRSM.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XNGI.DE.

Performance

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRSM.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than XNGI.DE's 14.41% return.

XRSM.DE

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 10.25%
• 1Y: 24.87%
• 3Y*: 19.47%
• 5Y*: 13.21%
• 10Y*: 13.75%

XNGI.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.35%
• YTD: 14.41%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRSM.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C	10.32%	8.27%
XNGI.DE Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C	14.41%	4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between XRSM.DE and XNGI.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRSM.DE

XRSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
XRSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
XRSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XRSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XRSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

XNGI.DE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRSM.DE	XNGI.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.10	—	—

Drawdowns

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.30%, which is greater than XNGI.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSM.DE and XNGI.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRSM.DE	XNGI.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.30%	-18.97%	-21.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-4.43%	+3.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.05%	-5.89%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XRSM.DE	XNGI.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	19.59%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.09%	19.59%	-3.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.16%	19.59%	-1.43%

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRSM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XNGI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRSM.DE vs. XNGI.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRSM.DE nor XNGI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRSM.DE and XNGI.DE in my portfolio?

XRSM.DE and XNGI.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XRSM.DE or XNGI.DE?

On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRSM.DE or XNGI.DE?

XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XNGI.DE.

What is the main difference between XRSM.DE and XNGI.DE?

XRSM.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XNGI.DE is Technology Equities. XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while XNGI.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Next Generation Internet Innovation Select ESG Screened 100. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSM.DE and 0.30% for XNGI.DE.