PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRSM.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than MIVU.DE's 4.05% return.


XRSM.DE

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.21%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.25%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
13.75%

MIVU.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.89%
YTD
4.05%
6M
4.75%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
9.24%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XRSM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
10.32%4.95%33.21%25.49%-17.04%39.25%5.31%33.46%-15.26%
MIVU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF
4.05%-3.87%22.89%5.36%-4.28%31.88%-5.36%30.00%-5.89%

Correlation

The correlation between XRSM.DE and MIVU.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2018

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between XRSM.DE and MIVU.DE has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRSM.DE
XRSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

MIVU.DE
MIVU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIVU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRSM.DEMIVU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.35

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.10

3.32

+6.78

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the MIVU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRSM.DE and MIVU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.30%, which is greater than MIVU.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSM.DE and MIVU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRSM.DEMIVU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.30%

-32.68%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-4.83%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.45%

-14.89%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-14.89%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-5.62%

+4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-6.16%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

1.97%

+0.49%

Volatility

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Amundi MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Factor UCITS ETF (MIVU.DE) at 2.49%. This indicates that XRSM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIVU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRSM.DEMIVU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.49%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

6.25%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

9.08%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

11.90%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

13.94%

+4.22%

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRSM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MIVU.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRSM.DE vs. MIVU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRSM.DE nor MIVU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XRSM.DE and MIVU.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while MIVU.DE tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSM.DE and 0.18% for MIVU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRSM.DE and MIVU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer