PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRSM.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than D6RQ.DE's 12.89% return.


XRSM.DE

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.21%
YTD
10.32%
6M
10.25%
1Y
24.87%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
13.75%

D6RQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
12.89%
6M
12.85%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XRSM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
10.32%4.95%33.21%25.49%-17.04%39.25%19.94%
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
12.89%4.36%42.08%34.15%-22.07%41.44%17.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XRSM.DE and D6RQ.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2020

0.90

The correlation between XRSM.DE and D6RQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRSM.DE
XRSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

D6RQ.DE
D6RQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
D6RQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRSM.DED6RQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

2.50

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.10

7.19

+2.91

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRSM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the D6RQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRSM.DE and D6RQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.30%, which is greater than D6RQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSM.DE and D6RQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRSM.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.30%

-27.29%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-12.28%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.45%

-27.29%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-27.29%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.28%

-2.16%

+0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-5.73%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

4.28%

-1.82%

Volatility

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) is 3.75%, while Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF (D6RQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that XRSM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than D6RQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRSM.DED6RQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.42%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

10.83%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

15.27%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

17.83%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

17.57%

+0.59%

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRSM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than D6RQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XRSM.DE vs. D6RQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XRSM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while D6RQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
D6RQ.DE
Deka MSCI USA Climate Change ESG UCITS ETF
0.38%0.53%0.39%0.60%0.80%0.46%0.25%
XRSM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XRSM.DE and D6RQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while D6RQ.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Change ESG Select. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Deka. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSM.DE and 0.25% for D6RQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRSM.DE and D6RQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer