XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE
XRSM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C) and 36B6.DE (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - XRSM.DE tracks the MSCI USA Select ESG Screened while 36B6.DE tracks the MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRSM.DE returned 13.21%/yr vs 12.05%/yr for 36B6.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRSM.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for 36B6.DE.
Performance
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRSM.DE achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than 36B6.DE's 17.30% return.
XRSM.DE
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 10.32%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 24.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
36B6.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 4.33%
- YTD
- 17.30%
- 6M
- 17.76%
- 1Y
- 26.26%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- —
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRSM.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 10.32% | 4.95% | 33.21% | 25.49% | -17.04% | 39.25% | 5.31% | 13.95% |
36B6.DE iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist | 17.30% | -0.74% | 20.36% | 20.16% | -14.22% | 43.32% | 13.71% | 21.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRSM.DE and 36B6.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XRSM.DE and 36B6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRSM.DE
36B6.DE
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRSM.DE | 36B6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 3.65 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.10 | 12.18 | -2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.30%, which is greater than 36B6.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSM.DE and 36B6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRSM.DE | 36B6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.30% | -34.22% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.52% | -7.16% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -23.76% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -23.76% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.50% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -4.93% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.15% | +0.31% |
Volatility
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XRSM.DE) and iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B6.DE) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRSM.DE | 36B6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.72% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 9.69% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 13.13% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 15.56% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 17.51% | +0.65% |
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRSM.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B6.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XRSM.DE vs. 36B6.DE - Dividend Comparison
XRSM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36B6.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36B6.DE iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.89% | 0.97% | 1.09% | 1.28% | 1.41% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.23% |
XRSM.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRSM.DE and 36B6.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XRSM.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XRSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 36B6.DE.
XRSM.DE tracks MSCI USA Select ESG Screened, while 36B6.DE tracks MSCI USA SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XRSM.DE and 0.20% for 36B6.DE.
Find the right allocation for XRSM.DE and 36B6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer