PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRS2.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX.DE's 37.21% return.


XRS2.DE

1D
0.92%
1M
2.92%
YTD
17.70%
6M
16.56%
1Y
38.02%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
10.28%

XAIX.DE

1D
-2.02%
1M
16.54%
YTD
37.21%
6M
37.25%
1Y
60.71%
3Y*
36.02%
5Y*
22.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XRS2.DE
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C
17.70%1.31%15.81%14.81%-16.50%24.61%8.18%13.03%
XAIX.DE
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF
37.21%15.25%34.63%63.77%-31.80%35.85%24.44%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XRS2.DE and XAIX.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2019

0.73

The correlation between XRS2.DE and XAIX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (3 years) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRS2.DE
XRS2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XRS2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRS2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XAIX.DE
XAIX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XAIX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAIX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRS2.DEXAIX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.51

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

5.11

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

14.72

-1.52

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRS2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the XAIX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRS2.DE and XAIX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRS2.DEXAIX.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

3.03

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.06

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

1.08

-0.71

Drawdowns

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, which is greater than XAIX.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRS2.DE and XAIX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRS2.DEXAIX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.13%

-33.08%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-12.10%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.77%

-27.61%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.77%

-33.08%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.11%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-7.39%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

4.21%

-1.32%

Volatility

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) is 5.29%, while Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence & Big Data UCITS ETF (XAIX.DE) has a volatility of 8.63%. This indicates that XRS2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAIX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRS2.DEXAIX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

8.63%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.16%

16.15%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

20.43%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

20.73%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.69%

21.30%

+0.39%

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRS2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than XAIX.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRS2.DE vs. XAIX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRS2.DE nor XAIX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XRS2.DE and XAIX.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRS2.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRS2.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAIX.DE.

XRS2.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XAIX.DE is Technology Equities. XRS2.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while XAIX.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XRS2.DE and 0.35% for XAIX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRS2.DE and XAIX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer