XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE
XRS2.DE (Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C) and ICGA.DE (iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XRS2.DE is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000®, while ICGA.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRS2.DE returned 7.04%/yr vs -4.32%/yr for ICGA.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRS2.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for ICGA.DE.
Performance
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRS2.DE achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than ICGA.DE's -6.86% return.
XRS2.DE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 38.02%
- 3Y*
- 15.29%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
ICGA.DE
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- -9.46%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.72%
- 5Y*
- -4.32%
- 10Y*
- —
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRS2.DE Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C | 17.70% | 1.31% | 15.81% | 14.81% | -16.50% | 24.61% | 8.18% | 11.61% |
ICGA.DE iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc | -6.86% | 16.64% | 27.28% | -14.71% | -15.17% | -17.27% | 15.31% | 14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRS2.DE and ICGA.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XRS2.DE
ICGA.DE
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) and iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRS2.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.04 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 0.16 | +4.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.20 | 0.34 | +12.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRS2.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 0.15 | +1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | -0.15 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.05 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRS2.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.13%, smaller than the maximum ICGA.DE drawdown of -55.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRS2.DE and ICGA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRS2.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.13% | -55.95% | +14.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.46% | -16.84% | +8.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.77% | -24.41% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.77% | -49.32% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -32.56% | +32.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -28.80% | +19.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 8.08% | -5.19% |
Volatility
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRS2.DE) is 5.29%, while iShares MSCI China UCITS ETF USD Acc (ICGA.DE) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that XRS2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICGA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRS2.DE | ICGA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 7.19% | -1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.16% | 13.31% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 18.64% | -0.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 27.66% | -6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.69% | 26.97% | -5.28% |
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRS2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ICGA.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRS2.DE vs. ICGA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRS2.DE nor ICGA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRS2.DE and ICGA.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ICGA.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ICGA.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for XRS2.DE.
XRS2.DE is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ICGA.DE is China Equities. XRS2.DE tracks Russell 2000®, while ICGA.DE tracks MSCI China. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for XRS2.DE and 0.28% for ICGA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XRS2.DE and ICGA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer