PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRPT vs. ZVOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -68.08% return, which is significantly lower than ZVOL's -1.71% return.


XRPT

1D
-12.32%
1M
-26.08%
YTD
-68.08%
6M
-77.97%
1Y
-87.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZVOL

1D
0.24%
1M
1.95%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
2.94%
1Y
9.50%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XRPT
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF
-68.08%-67.83%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
-1.71%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPT and ZVOL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRPT vs. ZVOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPT
XRPT Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ZVOL
ZVOL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ZVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ZVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRPTZVOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

0.51

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.90

0.89

-1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.10

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

0.62

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

1.99

-3.24

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the ZVOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRPT and ZVOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRPTZVOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

0.51

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.60

0.44

-1.04

Drawdowns

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -94.62%, which is greater than ZVOL's maximum drawdown of -37.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and ZVOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPTZVOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.62%

-37.25%

-57.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.62%

-16.46%

-78.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.62%

-21.71%

-72.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.86%

-13.42%

-49.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.95%

5.11%

+64.84%

Volatility

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 28.00% compared to Volatility Premium Plus ETF (ZVOL) at 3.67%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPTZVOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.00%

3.67%

+24.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.51%

13.26%

+93.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

150.66%

18.74%

+131.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

149.69%

29.28%

+120.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

149.69%

29.28%

+120.41%

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than ZVOL's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRPT vs. ZVOL - Dividend Comparison

XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than ZVOL's 70.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
XRPT
Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF
4.87%1.23%0.00%0.00%
ZVOL
Volatility Premium Plus ETF
70.72%53.44%30.68%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRPT and ZVOL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRPT has higher volatility (28.00%) compared to ZVOL (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -94.62% vs ZVOL's -37.25%.

On 1-year performance, ZVOL leads with 9.50% vs -87.06% for XRPT. On fees, XRPT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, ZVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZVOL has performed better with a 9.50% return vs -87.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRPT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL has the higher dividend yield at 70.72%, compared with 4.87% for XRPT.

XRPT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ZVOL is Volatility. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 1.35% for ZVOL.

ZVOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRPT and ZVOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer