XRPT vs. CBOO
XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
XRPT vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -70.47% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's -0.02% return.
XRPT
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -33.40%
- YTD
- -70.47%
- 6M
- -78.42%
- 1Y
- -88.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPT vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | -70.47% | -67.41% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.02% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPT and CBOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPT vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
XRPT
CBOO
XRPT vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRPT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | -1.17 | +0.57 |
Drawdowns
XRPT vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -95.02%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.02% | -2.34% | -92.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -95.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.02% | -1.70% | -93.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.11% | -1.61% | -61.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.46% | — | — |
Volatility
XRPT vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPT | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 104.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 150.33% | 2.14% | +148.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 2.14% | +147.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.19% | 2.14% | +147.05% |
XRPT vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPT vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF | 5.26% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPT and CBOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for XRPT.
XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
XRPT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for XRPT and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer