XRPT vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XRPT (Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRPT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. XRPT is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past year, XRPT returned -88.20% vs 4.21% for BSCQ. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XRPT charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRPT achieves a -74.98% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.68% return.

XRPT

• 1D: -5.55%
• 1M: -35.52%
• YTD: -74.98%
• 6M: -76.50%
• 1Y: -88.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 4.21%
• 3Y*: 5.17%
• 5Y*: 1.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF	-74.98%	-67.94%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	1.68%	3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPT and BSCQ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

XRPT vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPT

XRPT Risk / Return Rank: 3
XRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
XRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
XRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
XRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPT	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	6.97	-7.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.98	15.43	-16.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	3.40	-2.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	41.36	-42.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	181.24	-182.44

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the BSCQ Sharpe Ratio of 6.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRPT and BSCQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPT drawdown since its inception was -95.78%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPT and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPT	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.78%	-16.50%	-79.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-95.78%	-0.10%	-95.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.78%	-0.03%	-95.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.33%	-2.83%	-61.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	73.37%	0.02%	+73.35%

Volatility

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison

Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF (XRPT) has a higher volatility of 38.71% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.12%. This indicates that XRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRPT	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	38.71%	0.12%	+38.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	108.18%	0.42%	+107.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	151.81%	0.61%	+151.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.97%	3.29%	+146.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.97%	4.75%	+145.22%

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPT has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPT vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

XRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, more than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.11%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
XRPT Volatility Shares 2x XRP ETF	6.35%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPT and BSCQ in my portfolio?

XRPT and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRPT or BSCQ?

XRPT has higher volatility (38.71%) compared to BSCQ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPT dropped -95.78% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.

Which ETF is better, XRPT or BSCQ?

On 1-year performance, BSCQ leads with 4.21% vs -88.20% for XRPT. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRPT or BSCQ?

Over the 1-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 4.21% return vs -88.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPT or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for XRPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPT or BSCQ?

XRPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 4.11% for BSCQ.

What is the main difference between XRPT and BSCQ?

XRPT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPT and 0.10% for BSCQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.97 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.