XRPM vs. LQTI
XRPM (Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRPM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
XRPM vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPM achieves a -37.18% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.63% return.
XRPM
- 1D
- -2.28%
- 1M
- -16.11%
- YTD
- -37.18%
- 6M
- -43.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPM vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | -37.18% | -13.48% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.63% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPM and LQTI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPM vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
XRPM
LQTI
XRPM vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF (XRPM) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRPM | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.04 | 0.94 | -1.99 |
Drawdowns
XRPM vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPM drawdown since its inception was -46.50%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPM and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPM | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.50% | -3.41% | -43.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.50% | -0.97% | -45.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.98% | -0.88% | -26.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
XRPM vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPM | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.44% | 5.12% | +60.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 5.97% | +59.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.44% | 5.97% | +59.47% |
XRPM vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRPM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRPM vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
XRPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.17%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% |
XRPM Amplify XRP 3% Monthly Option Income ETF | 26.17% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPM and LQTI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XRPM.
XRPM has the higher dividend yield at 26.17%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XRPM and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for XRPM and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer