XRPI vs. SOLZ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XRPI (Volatility Shares XRP ETF) and SOLZ (Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XRPI returned -59.02% vs -58.31% for SOLZ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XRPI charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SOLZ.

Performance

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Volatility Shares XRP ETF (XRPI) and Solana ETF (SOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XRPI having a -45.56% return and SOLZ slightly lower at -47.60%.

XRPI

• 1D: -2.57%
• 1M: -23.08%
• YTD: -45.56%
• 6M: -46.34%
• 1Y: -59.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SOLZ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -21.19%
• YTD: -47.60%
• 6M: -46.61%
• 1Y: -58.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XRPI Volatility Shares XRP ETF	-45.56%	-32.74%
SOLZ Solana ETF	-47.60%	-33.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XRPI and SOLZ is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025	0.87

The correlation between XRPI and SOLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XRPI vs. SOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRPI

XRPI Risk / Return Rank: 3
XRPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
XRPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
XRPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3
XRPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
XRPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4

SOLZ

SOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3
SOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
SOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
SOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares XRP ETF (XRPI) and Solana ETF (SOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRPI	SOLZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.78	-0.78	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	-1.12	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.88	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	-0.77	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	-1.18	-0.02

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRPI Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the SOLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRPI and SOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRPI drawdown since its inception was -74.60%, roughly equal to the maximum SOLZ drawdown of -75.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPI and SOLZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRPI	SOLZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.60%	-75.68%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-74.60%	-75.68%	+1.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.60%	-74.68%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.42%	-35.88%	-5.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.30%	49.34%	-0.04%

Volatility

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Volatility Shares XRP ETF (XRPI) is 19.74%, while Solana ETF (SOLZ) has a volatility of 22.40%. This indicates that XRPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRPI	SOLZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.74%	22.40%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.89%	51.35%	+1.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.24%	74.70%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.51%	76.44%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.51%	76.44%	-0.93%

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRPI has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than SOLZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRPI vs. SOLZ - Dividend Comparison

XRPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than SOLZ's 4.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
SOLZ Solana ETF	4.48%	1.75%
XRPI Volatility Shares XRP ETF	4.56%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRPI and SOLZ in my portfolio?

XRPI and SOLZ have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRPI or SOLZ?

SOLZ has higher volatility (22.40%) compared to XRPI (19.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRPI dropped -74.60% vs SOLZ's -75.68%.

Which ETF is better, XRPI or SOLZ?

On 1-year performance, SOLZ leads with -58.31% vs -59.02% for XRPI. On fees, XRPI is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, XRPI has been the lower-risk option at 19.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRPI or SOLZ?

Over the 1-year period, SOLZ has performed better with a -58.31% return vs -59.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRPI or SOLZ?

XRPI is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SOLZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRPI or SOLZ?

XRPI has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 4.48% for SOLZ.

What is the main difference between XRPI and SOLZ?

Their fees differ too: 0.94% for XRPI and 0.95% for SOLZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XRPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.78 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.