PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRP vs. CBOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRP vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRP achieves a -34.50% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.03% return.


XRP

1D
-1.54%
1M
-14.12%
YTD
-34.50%
6M
-45.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBOL

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRP vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XRP and CBOL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRP vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRP vs. CBOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRPCBOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.83

-1.80

+0.96

Drawdowns

XRP vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRP drawdown since its inception was -48.71%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRP and CBOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRPCBOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.71%

-4.91%

-43.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.21%

-4.64%

-43.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.70%

-3.21%

-26.49%

Volatility

XRP vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRPCBOLDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.13%

3.88%

+71.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.13%

3.88%

+71.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.13%

3.88%

+71.25%

XRP vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRP has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRP vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

XRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XRP and CBOL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRP is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRP is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for XRP.

XRP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for XRP and 0.79% for CBOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRP and CBOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer