PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRES.L vs. UKRE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) and iShares MSCI Target UK Real Estate UCITS ETF (UKRE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XRES.L is traded in USD, while UKRE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UKRE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRES.L achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than UKRE.L's -4.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XRES.L has outperformed UKRE.L with an annualized return of 6.39%, while UKRE.L has yielded a comparatively lower -3.86% annualized return.


XRES.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
9.04%
6M
8.82%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
6.39%

UKRE.L

1D
0.56%
1M
0.66%
YTD
-4.00%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
-7.61%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
-8.06%
10Y*
-3.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRES.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
9.04%3.99%2.44%12.71%-25.97%46.91%-3.45%27.10%-2.96%10.89%
UKRE.L
iShares MSCI Target UK Real Estate UCITS ETF
-4.00%6.49%-14.58%6.17%-33.47%18.91%-9.04%23.86%-14.54%15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between XRES.L and UKRE.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2016

0.46

The correlation between XRES.L and UKRE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRES.L
UKRE.L

Real Estate

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

XRES.L
100.0%
UKRE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Communication Services

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Energy

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Financial Services

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Healthcare

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Industrials

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Technology

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Utilities

XRES.L

-

UKRE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRES.L
XRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

UKRE.L
UKRE.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
UKRE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UKRE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
UKRE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
UKRE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
UKRE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) and iShares MSCI Target UK Real Estate UCITS ETF (UKRE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRES.LUKRE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.93

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

-0.51

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

-0.95

+4.20

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the UKRE.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRES.L and UKRE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRES.LUKRE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

-0.51

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.45

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

-0.21

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.24

+0.63

Drawdowns

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRES.L drawdown since its inception was -37.84%, smaller than the maximum UKRE.L drawdown of -49.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRES.L and UKRE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRES.LUKRE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.84%

-49.21%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

-14.85%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.95%

-21.87%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-45.19%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.84%

-45.19%

+7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-42.84%

+39.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.17%

-27.40%

+17.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

8.04%

-5.17%

Volatility

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XRES.L) is 4.47%, while iShares MSCI Target UK Real Estate UCITS ETF (UKRE.L) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that XRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UKRE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRES.LUKRE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

5.06%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

11.43%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.25%

14.92%

-1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

17.96%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

18.31%

+0.58%

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRES.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than UKRE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRES.L vs. UKRE.L - Dividend Comparison

XRES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UKRE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UKRE.L
iShares MSCI Target UK Real Estate UCITS ETF
0.07%0.07%0.08%0.05%0.02%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.01%
XRES.L
Invesco Real Estate S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRES.L and UKRE.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRES.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRES.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for UKRE.L.

XRES.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Real Estate Index, while UKRE.L tracks MSCI UK IMI Liquid Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XRES.L and 0.40% for UKRE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRES.L and UKRE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer