XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO
XRB.TO (iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF) and ZTIP.TO (BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - XRB.TO tracks the FTSE Canada Real Return Bond Index while ZTIP.TO tracks the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XRB.TO returned -1.66%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for ZTIP.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XRB.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ZTIP.TO.
Performance
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRB.TO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than ZTIP.TO's 3.34% return.
XRB.TO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 3.06%
- 3Y*
- 1.50%
- 5Y*
- -1.66%
- 10Y*
- 0.06%
ZTIP.TO
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRB.TO iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF | 2.56% | 0.05% | 3.95% | -2.15% | -15.01% | 0.61% |
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF | 3.34% | 1.12% | 13.84% | 1.93% | 3.96% | 4.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRB.TO and ZTIP.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XRB.TO
ZTIP.TO
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRB.TO | ZTIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.30 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 1.59 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | 4.26 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRB.TO | ZTIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.30 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.99 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.84 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRB.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, which is greater than ZTIP.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRB.TO and ZTIP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRB.TO | ZTIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -5.60% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.55% | -3.78% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.65% | -5.60% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -5.60% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.56% | 0.00% | -13.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.09% | -1.53% | -5.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.41% | +0.37% |
Volatility
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) at 0.77%. This indicates that XRB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTIP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRB.TO | ZTIP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.72% | 0.77% | +1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.11% | 3.13% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.85% | 4.67% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.91% | 6.36% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 6.28% | +5.07% |
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTIP.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRB.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Dividend Comparison
XRB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than ZTIP.TO's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRB.TO iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF | 3.63% | 3.73% | 2.36% | 2.36% | 1.83% | 1.23% | 1.36% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 1.58% | 1.61% |
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF | 3.43% | 3.63% | 3.63% | 4.91% | 4.93% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRB.TO and ZTIP.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZTIP.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZTIP.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XRB.TO.
XRB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Real Return Bond Index, while ZTIP.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XRB.TO and 0.17% for ZTIP.TO.
Find the right allocation for XRB.TO and ZTIP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer