PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) and BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRB.TO achieves a 2.56% return, which is significantly lower than ZRE.TO's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XRB.TO has underperformed ZRE.TO with an annualized return of 0.06%, while ZRE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.80% annualized return.


XRB.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.21%
YTD
2.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
1.50%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*
0.06%

ZRE.TO

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.68%
YTD
9.53%
6M
10.66%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
6.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRB.TO
iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF
2.56%0.05%3.95%-2.15%-15.01%-1.30%12.11%5.93%-1.23%-0.11%
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
9.53%11.21%2.82%0.84%-17.80%33.96%-7.79%25.79%3.29%14.28%

Correlation

The correlation between XRB.TO and ZRE.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.09

Over the past year, XRB.TO and ZRE.TO have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRB.TO
XRB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XRB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ZRE.TO
ZRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) and BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRB.TOZRE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.61

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

4.29

-2.56

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRB.TO and ZRE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRB.TOZRE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

1.02

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.22

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

0.39

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.52

-0.25

Drawdowns

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRB.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum ZRE.TO drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRB.TO and ZRE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRB.TOZRE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-46.29%

+19.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-7.07%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.65%

-17.16%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-32.52%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.58%

-46.29%

+19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.56%

-0.71%

-12.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.74%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

2.64%

-0.86%

Volatility

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF (XRB.TO) and BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) have volatilities of 2.72% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRB.TOZRE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.83%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.11%

8.39%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.85%

11.09%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

15.55%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.35%

17.68%

-6.33%

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRB.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ZRE.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRB.TO vs. ZRE.TO - Dividend Comparison

XRB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than ZRE.TO's 4.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XRB.TO
iShares Canadian Real Return Bond Index ETF
3.63%3.73%2.36%2.36%1.83%1.23%1.36%1.72%1.74%1.69%1.58%1.61%
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
4.42%4.90%5.19%5.07%4.90%3.82%4.95%4.11%4.89%4.98%5.39%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRB.TO and ZRE.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRB.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRB.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZRE.TO.

XRB.TO is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while ZRE.TO is REIT. XRB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Real Return Bond Index, while ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XRB.TO and 0.61% for ZRE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRB.TO and ZRE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer