XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C (XQUI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).
XQUI.DE and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XQUI.DE is an actively managed fund by Xtrackers. It was launched on Nov 27, 2008. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016.
Performance
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQUI.DE Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C | 1.00% | 8.51% | 11.29% | 11.79% | -14.62% | 14.16% | 3.47% | 22.69% | -9.09% | 7.66% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -2.47% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | -0.07% | 30.55% | 2.69% | 27.24% | 5.96% | 5.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQUI.DE achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -2.47% return.
XQUI.DE
- 1D
- 2.37%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- 10.39%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- 5.35%
- 1Y
- -1.28%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQUI.DE has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XQUI.DE
XDWH.DE
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C (XQUI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQUI.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | -0.08 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 0.01 | +1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.00 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 0.01 | +1.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.45 | 0.01 | +7.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQUI.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | -0.08 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.56 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between XQUI.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XQUI.DE nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQUI.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQUI.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQUI.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -26.08% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.14% | -13.28% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.16% | -21.12% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -8.97% | +6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -4.72% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 5.71% | -4.18% |
Volatility
XQUI.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Portfolio UCITS ETF 1C (XQUI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that XQUI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XQUI.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 4.04% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.51% | 9.29% | -2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 16.42% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.06% | 13.28% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 14.71% | -3.59% |