PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XQQU.TO having a 22.83% return and XCS.TO slightly higher at 23.53%.


XQQU.TO

1D
0.47%
1M
13.16%
YTD
22.83%
6M
19.29%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XCS.TO

1D
-1.30%
1M
4.71%
YTD
23.53%
6M
21.57%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
22.83%15.17%36.07%6.90%
XCS.TO
iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF
23.53%43.37%18.11%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQU.TO and XCS.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XQQU.TO
XQQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XQQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS.TO
XCS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XCS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XQQU.TOXCS.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

2.89

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

3.30

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

4.29

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.54

14.67

-3.13

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is comparable to the XCS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQQU.TO and XCS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XQQU.TOXCS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.89

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.24

+1.37

Drawdowns

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum XCS.TO drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and XCS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQQU.TOXCS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.68%

-61.18%

+38.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.16%

-14.58%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.30%

+1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.37%

-16.96%

+13.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

4.25%

-0.46%

Volatility

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQQU.TOXCS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.56%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

17.35%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

21.66%

-6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

20.42%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

20.41%

-0.64%

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQU.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XCS.TO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCS.TO
iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF
1.03%1.36%1.73%2.59%2.07%1.51%1.78%2.27%2.12%1.81%1.46%2.34%
XQQU.TO
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.21%0.26%0.20%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQQU.TO and XCS.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XQQU.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XQQU.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XCS.TO.

XQQU.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XCS.TO is Canada Equities. XQQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XCS.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQU.TO and 0.60% for XCS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQU.TO and XCS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer