XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO
XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and XCS.TO (iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQU.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XCS.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XQQU.TO returned 43.63% vs 62.19% for XCS.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XQQU.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XCS.TO.
Performance
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XQQU.TO having a 22.83% return and XCS.TO slightly higher at 23.53%.
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCS.TO
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 23.53%
- 6M
- 21.57%
- 1Y
- 62.19%
- 3Y*
- 29.24%
- 5Y*
- 12.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.83% | 15.17% | 36.07% | 6.90% |
XCS.TO iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF | 23.53% | 43.37% | 18.11% | 2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQU.TO and XCS.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XQQU.TO
XCS.TO
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQQU.TO | XCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 2.89 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | 3.30 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 4.29 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 14.67 | -3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQQU.TO | XCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.89 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 0.24 | +1.37 |
Drawdowns
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, smaller than the maximum XCS.TO drawdown of -61.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and XCS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQU.TO | XCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -61.18% | +38.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -14.58% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.30% | +1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -16.96% | +13.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 4.25% | -0.46% |
Volatility
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF (XCS.TO) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQU.TO | XCS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.56% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 17.35% | -5.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 21.66% | -6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 20.42% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 20.41% | -0.64% |
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQU.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than XCS.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQQU.TO vs. XCS.TO - Dividend Comparison
XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than XCS.TO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS.TO iShares S&P/TSX SmallCap Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.36% | 1.73% | 2.59% | 2.07% | 1.51% | 1.78% | 2.27% | 2.12% | 1.81% | 1.46% | 2.34% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQQU.TO and XCS.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XQQU.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XQQU.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XCS.TO.
XQQU.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XCS.TO is Canada Equities. XQQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XCS.TO tracks Morningstar Canada Sml GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQU.TO and 0.60% for XCS.TO.
Find the right allocation for XQQU.TO and XCS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer