XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO
XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and QQQX.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - XQQU.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while QQQX.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XQQU.TO returned 43.63% vs 44.56% for QQQX.TO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XQQU.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQX.TO.
Performance
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XQQU.TO having a 22.83% return and QQQX.TO slightly lower at 22.62%.
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQX.TO
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 12.65%
- YTD
- 22.62%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 44.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.83% | 15.17% | 19.80% |
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 22.62% | 14.55% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QQQX.TO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QQQX.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XQQU.TO
QQQX.TO
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 2.79 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | 3.69 | -0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.49 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 3.70 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 11.92 | -0.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.79 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 1.44 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQX.TO drawdown of -22.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and QQQX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -22.62% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -12.18% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -3.97% | +0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 3.78% | +0.01% |
Volatility
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) is 4.36%, while Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that XQQU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQU.TO | QQQX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.77% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 11.97% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 16.02% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 20.76% | -0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 20.76% | -0.99% |
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQU.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQQU.TO vs. QQQX.TO - Dividend Comparison
XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than QQQX.TO's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XQQU.TO and QQQX.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QQQX.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQX.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQU.TO.
XQQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QQQX.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQU.TO and 0.15% for QQQX.TO.
Find the right allocation for XQQU.TO and QQQX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer