XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO
XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from iShares and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XQQU.TO returned 43.63% vs 35.37% for QQCI.TO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQQU.TO achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 15.60% return.
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 22.83%
- 6M
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.83% | 15.17% | 12.29% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 15.60% | 12.64% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XQQU.TO and QQCI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XQQU.TO
QQCI.TO
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XQQU.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.81 | 2.74 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.67 | 3.64 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.50 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 4.71 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 16.73 | -5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XQQU.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.74 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.61 | 1.51 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.68%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQU.TO and QQCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQU.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.68% | -18.95% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.16% | -7.62% | -4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -3.11% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 2.14% | +1.65% |
Volatility
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 3.40%. This indicates that XQQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQU.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 3.40% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 9.40% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 12.98% | +2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 15.56% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 15.56% | +4.21% |
Dividends
XQQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than QQCI.TO's 8.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.63% | 9.34% | 3.17% | 0.00% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQQU.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for XQQU.TO and QQCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer