PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XQQQX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (XQQQX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XQQQX achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XQQQX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


XQQQX

1D
2.92%
1M
-1.45%
6M
-1.29%
YTD
-0.81%
1Y
7.77%
3Y*
12.35%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
9.59%
ALL TIME*
4.97%

FTQGX

1D
2.20%
1M
-5.27%
6M
14.61%
YTD
18.58%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
17.90%
ALL TIME*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XQQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
-0.81%9.55%27.22%35.21%-27.72%19.87%16.62%25.33%-9.38%16.84%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
18.58%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XQQQX and FTQGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2007

0.86

The correlation between XQQQX and FTQGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XQQQX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XQQQX
XQQQX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XQQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XQQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (XQQQX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XQQQXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

2.03

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

6.94

-5.01

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XQQQX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XQQQX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XQQQX drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQQX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XQQQXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.29%

-61.29%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-12.76%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-26.84%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

-32.31%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.26%

-32.31%

+2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-10.41%

+2.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

-14.14%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

3.73%

-0.31%

Volatility

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (XQQQX) is 6.25%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that XQQQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XQQQXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

6.79%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

18.80%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

22.84%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.23%

22.25%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.33%

21.83%

-2.50%

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XQQQX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

XQQQX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

XQQQX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
10.49%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
XQQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
0.00%3.62%6.19%6.81%10.06%6.05%5.93%4.93%2.29%0.14%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XQQQX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to XQQQX (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XQQQX dropped -55.29% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XQQQX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer