XQQI vs. QQQE
XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. XQQI is actively managed, while QQQE is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XQQI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QQQE.
Performance
XQQI vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XQQI
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 16.12%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
XQQI vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 8.53% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQI and QQQE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQI vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank
XQQI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQE
XQQI vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XQQI | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XQQI vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQI drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum QQQE drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQI and QQQE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQI | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -32.14% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -3.35% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -5.14% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.86% | — |
Volatility
XQQI vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQI | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.11% | 15.82% | +11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.11% | 20.58% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.11% | 20.74% | +6.37% |
XQQI vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQQI vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison
XQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.35%, more than QQQE's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.57% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQQI and QQQE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XQQI.
XQQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.35%, compared with 0.57% for QQQE.
They also come from different issuers: NEOS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XQQI and 0.35% for QQQE.
Find the right allocation for XQQI and QQQE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer