XQQ.TO vs. AVDV
XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. XQQ.TO is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XQQ.TO returned 14.20%/yr vs 16.98%/yr for AVDV. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while AVDV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AVDV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XQQ.TO achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 17.38% return.
XQQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 29.88%
- 3Y*
- 23.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.20%
- 10Y*
- 20.22%
AVDV
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 17.38%
- 6M
- 18.91%
- 1Y
- 44.16%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- —
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 16.05% | 15.77% | 24.69% | 53.25% | -33.13% | 22.76% | 46.12% | 12.17% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 17.44% | 42.55% | 17.87% | 14.07% | -5.86% | 15.74% | 2.51% | 10.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQ.TO and AVDV is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XQQ.TO and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Communication Services
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Healthcare
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Industrials
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Utilities
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Basic Materials
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Energy
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Financial Services
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Real Estate
XQQ.TO
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
XQQ.TO
AVDV
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XQQ.TO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.47 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.46 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.78 | 14.22 | -7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -38.25%, roughly equal to the maximum AVDV drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQ.TO and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XQQ.TO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.25% | -37.43% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.68% | -12.81% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -14.53% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.25% | -22.53% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.39% | -1.00% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -5.01% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 3.12% | +1.30% |
Volatility
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 6.40%. This indicates that XQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XQQ.TO | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 6.40% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.89% | 14.18% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 16.48% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 18.25% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 20.45% | +2.06% |
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XQQ.TO vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
XQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than AVDV's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 4.11% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.52% | 0.80% | 1.44% | 1.61% | 1.64% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XQQ.TO and AVDV have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.
XQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XQQ.TO and 0.36% for AVDV.
Find the right allocation for XQQ.TO and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer