XPPT.DE vs. REGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XPPT.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities) and REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) are both Precious Metals funds - XPPT.DE tracks the Platinum while REGB.L tracks the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. Both are passively managed. XPPT.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REGB.L.

Performance

XPPT.DE vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

XPPT.DE

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -6.98%
• YTD: -14.27%
• 6M: 14.83%
• 1Y: 63.30%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: 10.73%
• 10Y*: —

REGB.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

XPPT.DE vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPPT.DE

XPPT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 40
XPPT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XPPT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
XPPT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 43
XPPT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
XPPT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPPT.DE vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XPPT.DE	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XPPT.DE	REGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	XPPT.DE	REGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.02%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.57%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.43%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XPPT.DE	REGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.67%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.36%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.46%	—	—

XPPT.DE vs. REGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than REGB.L's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

XPPT.DE vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPPT.DE nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XPPT.DE or REGB.L?

On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XPPT.DE or REGB.L?

XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.

What is the main difference between XPPT.DE and REGB.L?

XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.59% for REGB.L.