XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L
XPPT.DE (Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities) and GBSS.L (Gold Bullion Securities) are both Precious Metals funds - XPPT.DE tracks the Platinum while GBSS.L tracks the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XPPT.DE returned 10.73%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for GBSS.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XPPT.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GBSS.L.
Performance
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XPPT.DE is traded in EUR, while GBSS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GBSS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPPT.DE achieves a -14.27% return, which is significantly lower than GBSS.L's 2.11% return.
XPPT.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- -14.27%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 63.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
GBSS.L
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 26.41%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPPT.DE Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities | -14.27% | 114.44% | -3.35% | -8.94% | 16.19% | -1.94% | 14.62% |
GBSS.L Gold Bullion Securities | 2.11% | 45.14% | 33.99% | 9.23% | 5.76% | 3.19% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPPT.DE and GBSS.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2020 | 0.42 |
The correlation between XPPT.DE and GBSS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XPPT.DE
GBSS.L
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) and Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPPT.DE | GBSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.57 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 4.08 | +0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPPT.DE | GBSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.19 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.86 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.30 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPPT.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum GBSS.L drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPPT.DE and GBSS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPPT.DE | GBSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -52.60% | +19.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.37% | -17.54% | -15.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.37% | -20.30% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.37% | -20.30% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.02% | -17.54% | -14.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.57% | -16.86% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.43% | 6.76% | +9.67% |
Volatility
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers IE Physical Platinum ETC Securities (XPPT.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Gold Bullion Securities (GBSS.L) at 5.07%. This indicates that XPPT.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPPT.DE | GBSS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 5.07% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.66% | 20.07% | +19.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.67% | 23.10% | +22.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 21.71% | +8.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.46% | 17.98% | +12.48% |
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPPT.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GBSS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XPPT.DE vs. GBSS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XPPT.DE nor GBSS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XPPT.DE and GBSS.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XPPT.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XPPT.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GBSS.L.
XPPT.DE tracks Platinum, while GBSS.L tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for XPPT.DE and 0.40% for GBSS.L.
Find the right allocation for XPPT.DE and GBSS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer