PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPO vs. DECK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XPO vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPO achieves a 65.30% return, which is significantly higher than DECK's 5.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XPO has outperformed DECK with an annualized return of 36.48%, while DECK has yielded a comparatively lower 28.25% annualized return.


XPO

1D
2.61%
1M
9.86%
YTD
65.30%
6M
59.53%
1Y
89.63%
3Y*
66.70%
5Y*
35.18%
10Y*
36.48%

DECK

1D
1.48%
1M
9.27%
YTD
5.85%
6M
8.42%
1Y
0.47%
3Y*
10.47%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
28.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPO vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPO
XPO Logistics, Inc.
65.30%3.63%49.73%163.11%-27.64%11.60%49.56%39.73%-37.72%112.21%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
5.85%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%44.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XPO and DECK is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2003

0.24

The correlation between XPO and DECK shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XPO:

$26.73B

DECK:

$15.53B

EPS

XPO:

$2.92

DECK:

$6.98

PE Ratio

XPO:

76.98

DECK:

15.72

PEG Ratio

XPO:

2.89

DECK:

0.57

PS Ratio

XPO:

3.23

DECK:

2.94

PB Ratio

XPO:

14.44

DECK:

6.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

XPO:

$8.30B

DECK:

$5.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XPO:

$772.00M

DECK:

$3.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

XPO:

$1.20B

DECK:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPO vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPO
XPO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPO vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPODECKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.04

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.77

0.01

+5.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

0.03

+13.68

XPO vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPO Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPO and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPODECKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

0.01

+2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.35

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.67

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.24

+0.20

Drawdowns

XPO vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPO drawdown since its inception was -82.85%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPO and DECK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPODECKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.85%

-94.36%

+11.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.63%

-35.81%

+20.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.19%

-64.35%

+22.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.17%

-64.35%

+11.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.48%

-64.35%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-50.82%

+49.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-40.35%

+10.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.56%

16.94%

-10.38%

Volatility

XPO vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is 9.87%, while Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that XPO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPODECKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

11.51%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.81%

31.06%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.47%

45.42%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.90%

43.98%

+2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.80%

42.47%

+5.33%

Dividends

XPO vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

Neither XPO nor DECK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

XPO vs. DECK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between XPO Logistics, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.10B
1.12B
(XPO) Total Revenue
(DECK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XPO vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between XPO Logistics, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
57.6%
Portfolio components
XPO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

XPO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 174.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

XPO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPO Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 101.00M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XPO and DECK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECK has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to XPO (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPO dropped -82.85% vs DECK's -94.36%.

XPO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPO and DECK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer