PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPAY achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 5.55% return.


XPAY

1D
1.33%
1M
1.63%
6M
9.13%
YTD
11.32%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.18%

SPIN

1D
1.53%
1M
2.70%
6M
3.96%
YTD
5.55%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$98.77K$151.14K$120.62K
$1.77M$2.52M$3.75M

XPAY vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and SPIN is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.92

The correlation between XPAY and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

XPAY vs. SPIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPAY
SPIN

Technology

38.5%
39.0%

Financial Services

11.6%
12.3%

Communication Services

9.9%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.7%

Industrials

8.4%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.7%

Energy

3.0%
2.5%

Utilities

2.2%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.4%

Technology

XPAY
38.5%
SPIN
39.0%

Financial Services

XPAY
11.6%
SPIN
12.3%

Communication Services

XPAY
9.9%
SPIN
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XPAY
9.5%
SPIN
8.2%

Healthcare

XPAY
8.9%
SPIN
8.7%

Industrials

XPAY
8.4%
SPIN
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

XPAY
4.5%
SPIN
3.7%

Energy

XPAY
3.0%
SPIN
2.5%

Utilities

XPAY
2.2%
SPIN
1.9%

Real Estate

XPAY
1.8%
SPIN
1.5%

Basic Materials

XPAY
1.7%
SPIN
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XPAY vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPAYSPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.64

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

6.56

+3.61

XPAY vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, which is greater than SPIN's maximum drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYSPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-16.85%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-9.81%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-2.21%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.45%

-0.26%

Volatility

XPAY vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYSPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.70%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

8.88%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

11.67%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

14.28%

+2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

14.28%

+2.28%

XPAY vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.78%, more than SPIN's 4.89% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XPAY and SPIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPIN has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to XPAY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, XPAY leads with 22.25% vs 16.02% for SPIN. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XPAY has performed better with a 22.25% return vs 16.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 20.78%, compared with 4.89% for SPIN.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.25% for SPIN.

XPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer