PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPAY vs. GPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPAY vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XPAY having a 7.87% return and GPIX slightly higher at 7.91%.


XPAY

1D
-0.36%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
7.87%
6M
6.66%
1Y
21.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GPIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
7.91%
6M
6.94%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPAY vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XPAY and GPIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2024

0.97

The correlation between XPAY and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

XPAY vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XPAY
GPIX

Technology

39.0%
39.2%

Financial Services

11.1%
10.9%

Communication Services

10.6%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.3%

Industrials

7.8%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.2%

Utilities

2.1%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.7%

Technology

XPAY
39.0%
GPIX
39.2%

Financial Services

XPAY
11.1%
GPIX
10.9%

Communication Services

XPAY
10.6%
GPIX
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XPAY
9.9%
GPIX
10.1%

Healthcare

XPAY
8.3%
GPIX
8.3%

Industrials

XPAY
7.8%
GPIX
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

XPAY
4.5%
GPIX
4.4%

Energy

XPAY
3.1%
GPIX
3.2%

Utilities

XPAY
2.1%
GPIX
2.2%

Real Estate

XPAY
1.8%
GPIX
1.8%

Basic Materials

XPAY
1.7%
GPIX
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPAY vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPAY
XPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIX
GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPAY vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XPAYGPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.73

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

13.20

-3.00

XPAY vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPAY Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPAY and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XPAY vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPAY drawdown since its inception was -18.20%, roughly equal to the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPAY and GPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPAYGPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-17.50%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-7.71%

-1.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-2.29%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.48%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.59%

+0.51%

Volatility

XPAY vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF (XPAY) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.24%. This indicates that XPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPAYGPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.24%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

8.71%

+0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

10.79%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.82%

13.88%

+2.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

13.88%

+2.94%

XPAY vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XPAY has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XPAY vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

XPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.18%, more than GPIX's 8.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GPIX
Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF
8.14%8.01%7.45%1.40%
XPAY
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF
21.18%21.21%3.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XPAY and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XPAY has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to GPIX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPAY dropped -18.20% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

On 1-year performance, XPAY leads with 21.40% vs 20.92% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XPAY has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 20.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for XPAY.

XPAY has the higher dividend yield at 21.18%, compared with 8.14% for GPIX.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for XPAY and 0.29% for GPIX.

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPAY and GPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer